Re: [crash] af9005_usb_module_init(): BUG: unable to handle kernelpaging request at ff100000
From: Daniel Walker
Date: Wed Feb 04 2009 - 13:31:19 EST
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 18:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> c23eca7a <af9005_usb_module_init>:
> c23eca7a: 55 push %ebp
> c23eca7b: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
> c23eca7d: 53 push %ebx
> c23eca7e: b9 2b 31 11 c2 mov $0xc211312b,%ecx
> c23eca83: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
> c23eca85: b8 b8 b4 2b c2 mov $0xc22bb4b8,%eax
> c23eca8a: e8 d6 e8 4e ff call c18db365 <usb_register_driver>
> c23eca8f: 89 c3 mov %eax,%ebx
> c23eca91: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> c23eca93: 74 0f je c23ecaa4 <af9005_usb_module_init+0x2a>
> c23eca95: 50 push %eax
> c23eca96: 68 3a 31 11 c2 push $0xc211313a
> c23eca9b: e8 70 49 c6 fe call c1051410 <printk>
> c23ecaa0: 58 pop %eax
> c23ecaa1: 5a pop %edx
> c23ecaa2: eb 64 jmp c23ecb08 <af9005_usb_module_init+0x8e>
> c23ecaa4: c7 05 8c 71 cd c2 00 movl $0x0,0xc2cd718c
> c23ecaab: 00 00 00
> c23ecaae: c7 05 90 71 cd c2 00 movl $0x0,0xc2cd7190
> c23ecab5: 00 00 00
> c23ecab8: c7 05 94 71 cd c2 00 movl $0x0,0xc2cd7194
> c23ecabf: 00 00 00
> c23ecac2: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
> c23ecac7: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> c23ecac9: 74 12 je c23ecadd <af9005_usb_module_init+0x63>
> c23ecacb: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
> c23ecad0: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> c23ecad2: 74 09 je c23ecadd <af9005_usb_module_init+0x63>
> c23ecad4: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
> c23ecad9: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> c23ecadb: 75 17 jne c23ecaf4 <af9005_usb_module_init+0x7a>
> c23ecadd: 68 60 31 11 c2 push $0xc2113160
> c23ecae2: e8 29 49 c6 fe call c1051410 <printk>
> c23ecae7: c7 05 00 b6 2b c2 00 movl $0x0,0xc22bb600
> c23ecaee: 00 00 00
> c23ecaf1: 58 pop %eax
> c23ecaf2: eb 14 jmp c23ecb08 <af9005_usb_module_init+0x8e>
> c23ecaf4: c7 05 f8 b5 2b c2 00 movl $0x0,0xc22bb5f8
> c23ecafb: 00 00 00
> c23ecafe: a1 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0,%eax <= crash
> c23ecb03: a3 fc b5 2b c2 mov %eax,0xc22bb5fc
> c23ecb08: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax
> c23ecb0a: 8b 5d fc mov -0x4(%ebp),%ebx
> c23ecb0d: c9 leave
> c23ecb0e: c3 ret
Could this be a problem with your QA environment? (like distcc mixing
gcc versions) I'm not an assembly expert, but it looks like there are
several lines above that move zero into %eax , then test if %eax is
zero, and exit the function if it's zero.. for example line c23ecac2
which would jump over the crash line. I'm not sure how it's getting
there.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/