Early crash with 2.6.29-rc3

From: Andrew McMillan
Date: Wed Feb 04 2009 - 15:13:25 EST


Hi,

I see the following crash fairly early in the boot with a 2.6.29-rc3
kernel built with essentially the same options as my working 2.6.28
kernel on my Asus F3Ke laptop:

Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.29-rc3-happy #1) F3Ke
EIP: 0060:[<c02b6486>] EFLAGS: 00010217 CPU: 1
EIP is at acpi_ns_delete_node+0x16/0x5e
EAX: 00000000 EBX: f736a018 ECX: f7012858 EDX: 00000000
ESI: f736a018 EDI: f7012858 EBP: f704dcf8 ESP: f704dcf4
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 1, ti=f704c000 task=f7050000 task.ti=f704c000)
Stack:
00000000 f704dd14 c02b6524 6b000000 00000004 f70133c0 f735a800 f735a800
f704dd24 c02aa9d3 f735a800 00000000 f704dd40 c02b8a49 f7363f30 00000000
f735a800 00000000 f7002f80 f704dd58 c02b9c33 f7363fc0 f7002f90 f7002f80
Call Trace:
[<c02b6524>] ? acpi_ns_delete_namespace_by_owner+0x56/0xc3
[<c02aa9d3>] ? acpi_ds_terminate_control_method+0x60/0xac
[<c02b8a49>] ? acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x166/0x281
[<c02b9c33>] ? acpi_ps_execute_method+0x19a/0x253
[<c02b6693>] ? acpi_ns_evaluate+0xcb/0x17c
[<c02bc741>] ? acpi_ut_evaluate_object+0x39/0x140
[<c02bae8e>] ? acpi_rs_get_method_data+0x18/0x3c
[<c02ba82b>] ? acpi_walk_resources+0x39/0x91
[<c0666423>] ? check_mcfg_resource+0x0/0xaf
[<c0666410>] ? find_mboard_resource+0x1b/0x2e
[<c02b617f>] ? acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0xfe/0x112
[<c02b7806>] ? acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
[<c066639b>] ? is_acpi_reserved+0x0/0x5a
[<c02b6005>] ? acpi_get_devices+0x47/0x5d
[<c02b6081>] ? acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0x0/0x112
[<c06663f5>] ? find_mboard_resource++0x0/0x2e
[<c06663ec>] ? is_acpi_reserved+0x51/0x5a
[<c0665b9c>] ? is_mmconf_reserved+0x5c/0x128
[<c064f842>] ? acpi_parse_mcfg+0x8e/0x12c
[<c066635e>] ? __pci_mmcfg_init+0x30c/0x32e
[<c01d2783>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x33/0x50
[<c065ef04>] ? acpi_init+0x0/0x237
[<c066638a>] ? pci_mmcfg_late_init+0xa/0xc
[<c065f083>] ? acpi_init+0x17f/0x237
[<c010111a>] ? do_one_initcall+0x2a/0x150
[<c01d26b4>] ? create_proc_entry+0x54/0xa0
[<c016367c>] ? register_irq_proc+0x9c/0xb0
[<c01636f5>] ? init_irq_proc+0x65/0x80
[<c0643355>] ? kernel_init+0x127/0x180
[<c064322e>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x180
[<c0103cdb>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x1c
Code: ff ff ff 89 f0 e8 ed 05 00 00 89 c6 85 ff 75 bd 5b 5e 5f c9 55 89 e5 53
89 c3 e8 d7 05 00 00 31 d2 89 c1 8b 40 0c eb 05 89 c2 <8b> 40 10 39 d8 75 f7
d2 74 12 f6 43 06 01 8b 43 10 89 42 10
EIP: [<c02b6486>] acpi_ns_delete_node+016/0x5e SS:ESP 0068:f704dcf4
---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---


I hope this is useful. The above was transcribed from a photo and,
though I checked it, there is of course still the possibility of an
error somewhere. Please CC: me (or e-mail privately) if you have any
further questions about configuration or such, since I am not subscribed
to LKML.

Thanks,
Andrew McMillan.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64(272)DEBIAN
Beware of a tall blond man with one black shoe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part