Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator

[Nick Piggin]

On Thursday 05 February 2009 07:10:31 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Well, the slab_hiwater() check in __slab_free() of mm/slqb.c will cap
> > the size of the queue. But we do the same thing in SLAB with
> > alien->limit in cache_free_alien() and ac->limit in __cache_free(). So
> > I'm not sure what you mean when you say that the queues will "grow
> > unconstrained" (in either of the allocators). Hmm?
>
> Nick said he wanted to defer queue processing. If the water marks are
> checked and queue processing run then of course queue processing is not
> deferred and the queue does not build up further.

I don't think I ever said anything as ambiguous as "queue processing".
This subthread was started by your concern of periodic queue trimming,
and I was definitely talking about the possibility to defer *that*.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/