Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:53:23 EST


On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > make linux/types.h as assembly safe
> >
> > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
>
> But have not replied to my mail about that so far.

Sigh. No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and
covered all points in _that_ reply.

Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To:
header?

Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/