Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than120seconds.
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:03:26 EST
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 20:52 +0000, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Note that requiring kmemleak to be freezable looks only relevant if it does
> some memory allocations (hibernation needs some memory and prefer that there
> are not too much parallel memory allocations.)
OK. In this case, there is no need for the kmemleak thread to be
freezable. It only scans the memory periodically but doesn't allocate
any itself.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/