Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics

[Sukadev Bhattiprolu]

Sukadev Bhattiprolu [sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| Patches in this set:
| 
| 	[PATCH 1/7] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions
| 	[PATCH 2/7] Protect init from unwanted signals more
| 	[PATCH 3/7] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal()
| 	[PATCH 4/7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
| 	[PATCH 5/7] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals
| 	[PATCH 6/7] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary
| 	[PATCH 7/7] proc: Show SIG_DFL signals to init as "ignored" signals

Roland, Eric, Daniel, Pavel

Any comments on this patchset ? We are not sure about patch 7, but should
I send the rest to Andrew ?

Sukadev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/