Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: Include arch Makefiles as late aspossible

[Ingo Molnar]

* Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:20:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> [...]
> > But then, this commit reverted things back (w/o your Ack):
> > 
> > commit bef5b54bd7bf8117c75cb943d64549134c6d9a1f
> > Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Wed Jul 16 13:02:24 2008 +0100
> > 
> >     Fix MIPS cross-compile problem
> >     [...]
> >     Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > [...]
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -508,6 +508,8 @@ else
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -O2
> >  endif
> >  
> > +include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> > +
> >  ifneq (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN,0)
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
> >  endif
> > @@ -516,8 +518,6 @@ endif
> >  # Arch Makefiles may override this setting
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> >  
> > -include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> > -
> >  ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> >  else
> 
> Btw, I wonder if x86's CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is a no-op since
> v2.6.27-rc1? Seems like it is.

that's fixed and merged up for 2.6.30.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/