Re: git-send-email

From: Joel Becker
Date: Mon Feb 16 2009 - 16:01:52 EST


On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:20:20PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Just like the kernel folks take regressions seriously to the point to say
> > breaking one person's working setup is worse than fixing a known bug that
> > affects many more people,
>
> BTW, from the manual:
>
> --chain-reply-to, --no-chain-reply-to
> [...] Default is the value of the sendemail.chainreplyto
> configuration value; if that is unspecified, default to
> --chain-reply-to.
>
> Everybody who isn't afraid of configuration files can implement his
> preferred default easily.

Actually, the big trouble is when you log into a machine that
doesn't have your config and don't realize it. I have the configuration
option set, and I still put --no-chain-reply-to on every command line,
because I've been bitten before.
The problem with the default of --chain-reply-to is that many
folks consider the resulting email chain rude and stupid. So the
consequence of not putting it on every command line is occasionally
looking like an idiot.

Joel


--

f/8 and be there.

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/