Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Feb 16 2009 - 16:53:48 EST


On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:48:32 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Userland should never ever control the state of a device like this
> > directly. It should do so by a) closing the device and b) setting
> > latency / functional requirements.
>
> The user, however, may want to forcibly put a device into a low power
> state without stopping all of the applications that depend on it (eg.
> have it open). Do you think that we shouldn't allow users to do such
> things?

I would think that that is a bad mistake to do. It basically breaks the
contract that the kernel has with userspace....

--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/