Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Feb 16 2009 - 17:56:20 EST


On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:51:16 +0100
Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > > Userland should never ever control the state of a device like this
> > > directly. It should do so by a) closing the device and b) setting
> > > latency / functional requirements.
> >
> > The user, however, may want to forcibly put a device into a low
> > power state without stopping all of the applications that depend on
> > it (eg. have it open). Do you think that we shouldn't allow users
> > to do such things?
>
> I don't think we should do this... of you want device to be powered
> down, just don't keep it open. revoke should be enough :-).
>
> ...one execption here is the disk driver; unmounting filesystems to
> let the disk spin down is probably too heavy.

but spin down happens on non-activity ;)
it's more a slumber than a power down



--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/