Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization.

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Tue Feb 17 2009 - 18:17:19 EST


Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>>
>>> And on the big gotcha's I have found one more I am tracking.
>>>
>>> I am seeing pci bridges with a NULL pointer for the subordinate bus.
>>> Earlier I had thought that this was a symptom of the double remove
>>> but I have been able to reproduce it without that.
>>>
>>> On just a little bit deeper investigation it looks like the cases
>>> are dying are all coming when the nested bridge reappears.
>>>
>>> Which is wrong on so many levels as I am toggle power to the outer
>>> slot, so the nested bridge should not even exist at that time. Ugh.
>>> More tracing to for me on that one.
>>
>> Ok. Got it. I was processing the interrupt for a device after it had
>> been hot removed but before the device state had disappeared.
>>
>> pcie_isr looks like it would be even worse in that situation. Looping forever
>> if pciehp_readw(ctrl, PCIE_EXPSLTA) always succeed sand returns 0xffff.
>>
>> That loop in there appears impossibly misguided. If the pending interrupt
>> values change after you have received the interrupt another instance
>> of the same interrupt should be pending so the loop should be completely
>> unnecessary.
>>
>
> For level-triggered interrupt, I think it's true.
>
> But for edge-triggered interrupt, I don't think it's true. I think
> only one interrupt is generated if the first hotplug event occurs
> and the second hotplug event occurs before clearing the status of
> first hotplug event.

My test case is edge-triggered MSI's. The issue is that I get an interrupt
from the card that I am unplugging, but by the time the interrupt handler
is executed the card is physically absent, but the pci_dev structure is
still present in the kernel.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/