Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

[mark gross]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:23:30PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:19:38AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > This, again, seems to be a bit x86-centric. :-)  The Android people are telling
> > us that on the hardware they deal with it does make sense to put the entire
> > system to sleep even for relatively short periods of time, since the latencies
> > involved are not too bad.
> 
> Arve said that the power state was equivalent in idle and suspend, but 
> that they preferred suspend because it stopped any periodic timers. I'd 
> be more interested in making sure that unnecessary timers aren't running 
> than focusing on automatically entering system-wide suspend - Nokia have 
> been managing this since 2005 with good results.
>

I think they where talking timers as hardware devices pulling electrons,
not SW timers triggering wake ups.  I guess the timer hardware could be
running, and pulling power, even when not programmed to trigger any
event or IRQ.

--mgross
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/