Re: [PATCH 28/43] drivers/net/skfp: fix sparse warning: Should itbe static?

From: David Miller
Date: Tue Feb 17 2009 - 20:41:59 EST


From: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:43:15 +0100

> Impact: Move function declarations to header file.
>
> Fix this sparse warnings:
> drivers/net/skfp/cfm.c:146:6: warning: symbol 'all_selection_criteria' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/drvfbi.c:186:6: warning: symbol 'mac1_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/drvfbi.c:284:6: warning: symbol 'read_address' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/drvfbi.c:323:6: warning: symbol 'init_board' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/fplustm.c:72:24: warning: symbol 'fddi_broadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/fplustm.c:679:6: warning: symbol 'mac2_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/fplustm.c:805:6: warning: symbol 'mac3_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/fplustm.c:856:5: warning: symbol 'init_fplus' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/pcmplc.c:404:6: warning: symbol 'init_plc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/pcmplc.c:1592:5: warning: symbol 'pcm_status_twisted' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/skfp/smtinit.c:68:5: warning: symbol 'init_smt' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/