Re: [BUG] SNAT sometimes allows packets to pass through unchanged

[Patrick McHardy]

Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> > The NAT table only sees the first packet of every connection
> > and never INVALID packets. The mangle table should work fine.
>
> I ended up adding a rule to the FORWARD chain of the filter table.  
> The trick was to select based on the state.  That worked; it saw all
> those un-NATed packets and was able to eliminate them.  In case you're
> curious, the rule was essentially this:
>
> iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -s 10.0.0.0/8 -m state --state INVALID -j DROP
>
> Ideally, the rule should select all the packets which haven't been
> altered by SNAT, not just the ones marked INVALID.  Is there any way to
> do this?

Not in the sense that you could somehow catch valid packets "missed"
by SNAT, that would be a bug. The conntrack match supports matching
on whether the state says that a packet should be NATed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/