Re: [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match

[etienne]

hello,

Paul Moore wrote:
..
> Well, since you have some time and willingness to do things "the right way" I 
> would recommend dropping these patches (which are really just band-aids) and 
> working on the right solution to stored the addresses/masks in a sorted list 
> with the mask already applied.
> 
OK, I'm about to send a new patch; but while testing my patches and reading code, I noticed another bug : 

In smackfs.c:smk_write_netlbladdr
the netmask mask.s_addr is not handled correctly, the netmask should be :
1- computed in u32
2- converted to be32 !!
with current code, a "pseudo u32 mask" is applied to a be32 ipaddr; it occurs to works for "common netmasks" (multiple of 8), not for "intermediate" mask (/15, /25)


> FWIW, the NetLabel code (net/netlabel) has to do very similar things with 
> sorted address lists so I built an address list construct which builds on the 
> list.h ideas and operates in a similar way.  You may find it helpful.
> 
OK, I tested some code in userspace and when i was confident enough coded it to kernel

>> I think this should go to stable too?
> 
> I would worry about getting the patches developed, tested and in an acceptable 
> form first, then we can worry about where they should be applied ;)
> 

OK :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/