Re: [PATCH] new irq tracer

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Hi Jason,

> * Jason Baron (jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > hi,
> > 
> > Using a copule of tracepoints i've implemented an 'irq tracer' which has
> > the following column format:
> > 
> > [time][irq][action][handled][cpu][length]
> > 
> > for example on my system:
> > 
> > [ 1038.927248381]     28     eth0      1        3     0.000002745
> > [ 1038.927544688]     28     eth0      1        3     0.000002520
> > [ 1038.927593609]     28     eth0      1        3     0.000002509
> > [ 1038.974087675]     29     ahci      1        1     0.000013135
> > [ 1038.974288475]     29     ahci      1        1     0.000005542
> > [ 1038.974414324]     29     ahci      1        1     0.000007953
> > 
> > I think this patch is useful in understanding irq system behavior, and
> > for tracking down irq driver handlers that are firing too often or
> > spending too much time handling an irq. This approach could be extended
> > to the timer irq and for softirqs...
> > 
> > thanks,



> > @@ -354,7 +358,9 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action)
> >  		local_irq_enable_in_hardirq();
> >  
> >  	do {
> > +		trace_irq_entry(irq);
> >  		ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
> > +		trace_irq_exit(irq, ret);
> >  		if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
> >  			status |= action->flags;
> >  		retval |= ret;

May I ask why you select this line?

IOW, I guess your probe point is interest to irq action and mathieu's 
probe point is interest to interrupt itself.

I guess you also want to observe shared irq problem, right?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/