Re: [PATCH] mmc_core: fix data timeout for SEND_EXT_CSD

From: Adrian Hunter
Date: Thu Feb 19 2009 - 02:20:21 EST


ext Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:49:59 +0200
Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Commit 0d3e0460f307e84904968aad6cff97bd688583d8
"MMC: CSD and CID timeout values" inadvertently broke
the timeout for the MMC command SEND_EXT_CSD.

This patch puts it back again.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
index 9c50e6f..418a270 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
@@ -248,12 +248,16 @@ mmc_send_cxd_data(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_host *host,

sg_init_one(&sg, data_buf, len);

- /*
- * The spec states that CSR and CID accesses have a timeout
- * of 64 clock cycles.
- */
- data.timeout_ns = 0;
- data.timeout_clks = 64;
+ if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) && opcode == MMC_SEND_EXT_CSD)
+ mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
+ else {
+ /*
+ * The spec states that CSR and CID accesses have a timeout
+ * of 64 clock cycles (8 for SPI).
+ */
+ data.timeout_ns = 0;
+ data.timeout_clks = 64;
+ }

mmc_wait_for_req(host, &mrq);


I'm confused. Where did the 64 come from in the first place? That
function will not be called for CID/CSD when !SPI. So the way I see it
the code should be:

if ((opcode == MMC_SEND_CSD) || (opcode == (MMC_SEND_CID)) {
data.timeout_ns = 0;
data.timeout_clks = 8;
} else {
mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
}

Theoretically yes, it should be 8 not 64 - if all the SPI devices obey
the standard. As I do not have an SPI device I did not feel comfortable
changing it. Also 64 clocks is not a long time anyway, so it did not
seem to do any harm.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/