On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:49:59 +0200
Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Commit 0d3e0460f307e84904968aad6cff97bd688583d8
"MMC: CSD and CID timeout values" inadvertently broke
the timeout for the MMC command SEND_EXT_CSD.
This patch puts it back again.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
index 9c50e6f..418a270 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
@@ -248,12 +248,16 @@ mmc_send_cxd_data(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_host *host,
sg_init_one(&sg, data_buf, len);
- /*
- * The spec states that CSR and CID accesses have a timeout
- * of 64 clock cycles.
- */
- data.timeout_ns = 0;
- data.timeout_clks = 64;
+ if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) && opcode == MMC_SEND_EXT_CSD)
+ mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
+ else {
+ /*
+ * The spec states that CSR and CID accesses have a timeout
+ * of 64 clock cycles (8 for SPI).
+ */
+ data.timeout_ns = 0;
+ data.timeout_clks = 64;
+ }
mmc_wait_for_req(host, &mrq);
I'm confused. Where did the 64 come from in the first place? That
function will not be called for CID/CSD when !SPI. So the way I see it
the code should be:
if ((opcode == MMC_SEND_CSD) || (opcode == (MMC_SEND_CID)) {
data.timeout_ns = 0;
data.timeout_clks = 8;
} else {
mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
}