Re: [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > I see. But that would be new behaviour. I would propose to use
> > completely separate macro's to handle frame-setup code generation,
> > and keep ENTRY/GLOBAL/END/ENDPROC only for setting metadata and
> > alignment. I think it's worth it to spell out code-generating
> > macro's explicitly: there are not that many asm functions, and
> > quite a few of them would need special handling. I think noone
> > wants to see an ENDPROC_NOFRAMETEARDOWN ;).
> > 
> > The common-case example would look like this.
> > 
> > GLOBAL(c_callable_function)
> >         ENTER
> >         [asm-code]
> >         LEAVE
> >         ret
> > ENDPROC(c_callable_function)
> > 
> 
> I guess I'm a bit concerned about people omitting them, but it's equally
> concerning that people use the wrong macros, so yes, it's probably the
> better thing in the long run.

ok - i've applied Cyrill's patches to tip/x86/asm.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/