Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] ptrace_untrace: fix the SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED check
From: Roland McGrath
Date: Thu Feb 19 2009 - 22:49:49 EST
> This bug is ancient too. ptrace_untrace() must not resume the task
> if the group stop in progress, we should set TASK_STOPPED instead.
Right, the change looks correct.
> Unfortunately, we still have problems here:
>
> - if the process/thread was traced, SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED
> does not necessary means this thread group is stopped.
>
> - ptrace breaks the bookkeeping of ->group_stop_count.
Neither of these should be true today as I understand the code. So if you
have reason to think these, I must be missing something that is likely to
be relevant to reviewing this change.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/