Re: [PATCH 4/8] can: Driver for the SJA1000 CAN controller

From: David Miller
Date: Fri Feb 20 2009 - 03:47:08 EST


From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:14:40 -0700

> I won't be able to look at all of these...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> > index d609895..78a412b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> > @@ -35,6 +35,17 @@ config CAN_CALC_BITTIMING
> > files "tq", "prop_seg", "phase_seg1", "phase_seg2" and "sjw".
> > If unsure, say Y.
> >
> > +config CAN_SJA1000
> > + depends on CAN_DEV
> > + tristate "Philips SJA1000"
> > + ---help---
> > + The SJA1000 is one of the top CAN controllers out there. As it
> > + has a multiplexed interface it fits directly to 8051
> > + microcontrollers or into the PC I/O port space. The SJA1000
> > + is a full CAN controller, with shadow registers for RX and TX.
> > + It can send and receive any kinds of CAN frames (SFF/EFF/RTR)
> > + with a single (simple) filter setup.
>
> This sounds more like advertising text. But what people need to know is
> whether they should enable it or not.

Totally agreed, this Kconfig help text is inappropriate
at best.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/