Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-graph-tracer: make set_graph_functionfile support ftrace regex

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:42:47 EST


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:40:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Impact: trace only functions matching a pattern
> >
> > The set_graph_function file let one to trace only one or several
> > chosen functions and follow all their code flow.
> >
> > Currently, only a constant function name is allowed so this patch
> > allows the ftrace_regex functions:
> >
> > _ matches all functions that end with "name":
> > echo *name > set_graph_function
> >
> > _ matches all functions that begin with "name":
> > echo name* > set_graph_function
> >
> > _ matches all functions that contains "name":
> > echo *name* > set_graph_function
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > echo mutex* > set_graph_function
> >
> > 0) | mutex_lock_nested() {
> > 0) 0.563 us | __might_sleep();
> > 0) 2.072 us | }
> > 0) | mutex_unlock() {
> > 0) 1.036 us | __mutex_unlock_slowpath();
> > 0) 2.433 us | }
> > 0) | mutex_unlock() {
> > 0) 0.691 us | __mutex_unlock_slowpath();
> > 0) 1.787 us | }
> > 0) | mutex_lock_interruptible_nested() {
> > 0) 0.548 us | __might_sleep();
> > 0) 1.945 us | }
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> Applied, thanks Frederic!
>
> I'm wondering about the following: the whole set_graph_function
> method is limited (to FTRACE_GRAPH_MAX_FUNCS, 32 entries), is
> not scalable (we walk the array of functions at every function
> trace point), has a separate API, etc.
>
> Wouldnt we off better with a good, generic function attributes
> hash, and an extension to the generic regexp parser to enable
> the setting of those attributes? One such attribute could be the
> 'expand child function'
>
> Ingo

And well, you are answering this question I couldn't solve yesterday.
One of my goal was to be able to trace easily the syscalls:

echo sys_* > set_graph_function

But this array is static. And making it runtime resizable resulted in other problems:
locking? but doing that for each function is unacceptable. rcu was a good
candidate but I wonder that rcu would have been traced too, occuring tracing recursion.

Well, using such generic hashtable with such an attribute is really a good idea.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/