Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules

[Scott James Remnant]

On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 17:36 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:29:52PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> 
> > In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply
> > having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our
> > kernels.
> 
> It makes sense to have p4-clockmod from a thermal management 
> perspective. We should probably bump its transition latency to more than 
> 10ms to prevent ondemand binding to it.
> 
If that's possible; that'd be good.

The trouble with it is that it never seems to bring the CPU anywhere
near maximum performance.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part