On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:01:21PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:[...]The unsupported jumbo message might be a clue. When we jump to the next:
label, the buffer is at the end of the list in software, while in
hardware it isn't. In theory, we might hit the bug with rx buffers
exhaustion, because the test (bf_last == bf) doesn't work as expected then.
This seems to be happening somewhat regularly now - I've got a small
collections of the warnings (I'll include them below in case they are
any help):
[11207.741042] Object 0xd7060000: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
[11207.741071] Object 0xd7060010: 80 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 30 ab 1a 32 3f ....ÿÿÿÿÿÿ.0«.2?