Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync

[Steve French]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Horst Reiterer
<horst.reiterer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In any case, it's probably a good idea to introduce a mount option. The
> new behavior should be enabled by default though, to provide maximum data
> consistency.

Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option?  How about
"nostrictfsync"  ?

-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/