Re: kernel building procedure changed?

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Sun Feb 22 2009 - 18:16:11 EST


On 23.2.2009 00:00, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:27:51PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 22.2.2009 23:16, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:07:48AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
Hi all,

I found a bit strange thing happens now --
plain

make arch/x86/kernel/head64.o

doesn't work anymore. Instead of compiling
_just_ this file I've got the following:

---
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make arch/x86/kernel/head64.o
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
AS arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syscall-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
LD arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
CC fs/hpfs/dnode.o
make[2]: *** [fs/hpfs/dnode.o] Interrupt
make[1]: *** [fs/hpfs] Interrupt
make: *** [fs] Interrupt
---

I've done make allyesconfig previously.
I don't understand what I'm doing wrong... :(
I should work...
It is matter of days, new mmotm doesn't work either, older did.

Does it happen with -next?

yes, aa0f1f110f4cbbbb83fbac36f71651b232cd8b32

Does it happen with mainline?

yes, 683fdc5fe5fec5c4f27eb58a8781f212f50c8e01

I need to know what tree to look at - and I do not have mmotm handy.

some of -tip too, 8075257261ba779bfc81bec4b633a3984617cdd5 -- this sha posted me Cyrill before he left.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/