Re: [PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no end-of-busy IRQ
From: Ben Dooks
Date: Sun Feb 22 2009 - 21:43:19 EST
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:08 +0300
> Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail
> > to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and
> > the bus busy state finished.
> >
> > Changes in e809517f6fa5803a5a1cd56026f0e2190fc13d5c to use the
> > new busy method are the cause of the behaviour change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Any objections to me merging this right away? It is needed for another
> controller.
none from me.
sorry about the delay, moving servers.
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/