Re: [PATCH 20/20] Get rid of the concept of hot/cold page freeing

[Andrew Morton]

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:17:29 +0000 Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Currently an effort is made to determine if a page is hot or cold when
> it is being freed so that cache hot pages can be allocated to callers if
> possible. However, the reasoning used whether to mark something hot or
> cold is a bit spurious. A profile run of kernbench showed that "cold"
> pages were never freed so it either doesn't happen generally or is so
> rare, it's barely measurable.
> 
> It's dubious as to whether pages are being correctly marked hot and cold
> anyway. Things like page cache and pages being truncated are are considered
> "hot" but there is no guarantee that these pages have been recently used
> and are cache hot. Pages being reclaimed from the LRU are considered
> cold which is logical because they cannot have been referenced recently
> but if the system is reclaiming pages, then we have entered allocator
> slowpaths and are not going to notice any potential performance boost
> because a "hot" page was freed.
> 
> This patch just deletes the concept of freeing hot or cold pages and
> just frees them all as hot.
> 

Well yes.  We waffled for months over whether to merge that code originally.

What tipped the balance was a dopey microbenchmark which I wrote which
sat in a loop extending (via write()) and then truncating the same file
by 32 kbytes (or thereabouts).  Its performance was increased by a lot
(2x or more, iirc) and no actual regressions were demonstrable, so we
merged it.

Could you check that please?  I'd suggest trying various values of 32k,
too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/