Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM: Rework handling of interrupts duringsuspend-resume

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> > 
> > > +
> > > +	suspend_device_irqs();
> > >  	device_power_down(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > > +
> > > +	local_irq_disable();
> > 
> > hm, this is a very repetitive pattern, all around the various 
> > suspend/resume variants. Might make sense to make:
> > 
> >   	device_power_down(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > 
> > do the irq line disabling plus the local irq disabling 
> > automatically. That also means it cannot be forgotten. The 
> > symmetric action should happen for PMSG_RESUME.
> > 
> > Is there ever a case where we want a different pattern?
> 
> Even if there's no such case, I prefer to call 
> local_irq_disable() explicitly in here, so that it's clearly 
> known where it happens to anyone reading this code.

That property can be implied in the function name:

   	device_power_down_irq_disable(PMSG_SUSPEND);

Open-coding it, if it looks the same in all the cases just 
increases the chances that someone somewhere copies them 
incorrectly.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/