Re: [PATCH] Add to_delayed_work macro

[Jean Delvare]

On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:32:48 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:29:52 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:34:40 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > +#define to_delayed_work(_work)	container_of(_work, struct delayed_work, work)
> >> 
> >> As this is specifically designed to operate on a `struct work*', as
> >> opposed to "any struct which has a field called `work'", we can get
> >> additional type-safety by putting a C interface around it.
> > 
> > This is what I wanted to do in the first place, but then I noticed that
> > _all_ such wrappers around container_of are implemented as macros
> > rather than inline functions.
> 
> /Almost/ all.
> 
> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.28/drivers/firewire/fw-device.h#L73

Ah, I missed that one because it's not named to_<something>, sorry.

> > So I decided to follow the crowd. Any idea why it is so?
> 
> Merely old habits.


-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/