Re: [patch] Re: scheduler oddity [bug?]

[David Newall]

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:30 +1030, David Newall wrote:
>   
>> Wasn't it reported to be caused by an off-by-one bug in commit 
>> 38736f475071b80b66be28af7b44c854073699cc?
>>     
>
> Completely different issue. Unfortunate interference of effects though.


And yet, there *is* a bug in that commit, being, as I explained, that it
won't return a task if it's the last entry in the list, which seems
quite likely immediately after a fork.  Has my patch been tried?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/