Re: [PATCH] x86 (64): make calibrate_APIC_clock() SMI-safe (take3)

[Martin Wilck]

Hi Jean,

same answer as on Bugzilla...

> Sorry for replying to such an old thread, but did this patch go
> anywhere? I can't seem to find it in git. Was it somehow obsoleted
> by a different fix for the same issue (SMI flood during APIC
> calibration)? Or is the upstream kernel still affected?

We were asked for a solution for all affected architectures (in 
particular, also i386) which was more than we were able to do
at the time, given that the pressure had been reduced by finding a BIOS 
fix for the particular situation on system in question.

The APIC clock calibration code on i386 is more complex than x86_64, we 
saw no way to provide a high-quality, regression-safe, tested patch for 
that to upstream with a reasonable amount of effort.

That aside, I still think the x86_64 patch is fine and won't cause 
regressions. It just doesn't help on 32bit systems.

Martin

--
Martin Wilck
PRIMERGY System Software Engineer
FSC IP ESP DEV 6

Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1
33106 Paderborn
Germany

Tel:			++49 5251 525 2796
Fax:			++49 5251 525 2820
Email:			mailto:martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Internet:		http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com
Company Details:	http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/