Re: [crash] Re: Latest brk patchset

[H. Peter Anvin]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > could be max_pfn_mapped change in head_32.S that reduce mapping range 
> > to _end only.
> >   
>
> Yes, I would say you're right.  Trimming the mapping to _end only leaves 
> the space under the kernel avaliable for allocating pagetable from e820 
> space.  In this case we've got DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enabled, which inhibits 
> the use of PSE, and BIOS corruption checking on, which eats a chunk of 
> low memory.  In combination, there's only 0x8f000 bytes free below the 
> kernel, and it needs 0xe1000 to allocate for pagetables.
>
> Reverting 2bd2753ff46346543ab92e80df9d96366e21baa5 fixes the problem for 
> me, though it does result in a kernel with a 73MB BSS...

I did kind of think that was a bit fishy, but I somehow assumed you'd 
taken the consequences into account.  Obviously not.

The 73 MB brk isn't a problem per se as it will not be used in most 
systems.  This, in fact, is the whole reason for using brk and not just 
bss: it allows unused brk to be reclaimed at a relatively early stage.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/