Re: 29-rc-mmotm - HID/USB wedge w/ WARNING: atkernel/workqueue.c:371
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Mar 17 2009 - 17:13:17 EST
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:33:09 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> 29-rc3-mmotm0129 is OK, I hit it a few times under rc5-mmotm0214, but I'm
> seeing it a lot under -rc8-mmotm0313 (have triggered it 6 times in the past 4
> hours). Very consistent traceback out of the HID and USB stack - the events/0
> kernel thread loses its shit:
>
> [ 3816.196809] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 3816.196815] WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:371 flush_cpu_workqueue+0x32/0x82()
> [ 3816.196820] Hardware name: Latitude D820
> [ 3816.196823] Modules linked in: irnet ppp_generic slhc irtty_sir sir_dev ircomm_tty ircomm irda crc_ccitt coretemp sunrpc nf_conntrack_ftp xt_pkttype nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT xt_recent ipt_LOG xt_u32 xt_multiport iptable_filter ip_tables xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6t_LOG xt_limit ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic rtc acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm tpm_bios arc4 ecb nvidia(P) iwl3945 iwlcore mac80211 ohci1394 pcmcia ieee1394 dell_laptop yenta_socket led_class snd_hda_codec_idt video processor uhci_hcd iTCO_wdt rsrc_nonstatic cfg80211 snd_hda_intel intel_agp pcmcia_core iTCO_vendor_support rfkill output snd_hda_codec button battery thermal ac dcdbas [last unloaded: microcode]
> [ 3816.196950] Pid: 9, comm: events/0 Tainted: P 2.6.29-rc8-mmotm0313 #3
> [ 3816.196955] Call Trace:
> [ 3816.196965] [<ffffffff80233e53>] warn_slowpath+0xaf/0xd6
> [ 3816.196974] [<ffffffff803b78a5>] ? extract_buf+0x8e/0xc3
> [ 3816.196983] [<ffffffff8027e07a>] ? list_add+0xc/0xe
> [ 3816.196990] [<ffffffff8027eb0b>] ? __free_one_page+0x17f/0x1e6
> [ 3816.196997] [<ffffffff80243ea6>] flush_cpu_workqueue+0x32/0x82
> [ 3816.197032] [<ffffffff804214dd>] ? usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x48/0x84
> [ 3816.197040] [<ffffffff80422762>] ? usb_kill_urb+0x21/0xce
> [ 3816.197046] [<ffffffff802444d7>] flush_workqueue+0x4d/0x67
> [ 3816.197053] [<ffffffff80244501>] flush_scheduled_work+0x10/0x12
> [ 3816.197061] [<ffffffff8045da33>] hid_cease_io+0x3b/0x40
> [ 3816.197067] [<ffffffff8045da7b>] hid_pre_reset+0x43/0x4a
> [ 3816.197073] [<ffffffff8041e627>] usb_reset_device+0x6c/0x11c
> [ 3816.197080] [<ffffffff8045e535>] hid_reset+0x9e/0x12e
> [ 3816.197086] [<ffffffff8045e497>] ? hid_reset+0x0/0x12e
> [ 3816.197092] [<ffffffff80243bca>] worker_thread+0x1d3/0x27b
> [ 3816.197100] [<ffffffff802477c1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
> [ 3816.197106] [<ffffffff802439f7>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x27b
> [ 3816.197113] [<ffffffff802473bb>] kthread+0x55/0x80
> [ 3816.197120] [<ffffffff8020c15a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [ 3816.197128] [<ffffffff8020bb2d>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [ 3816.197135] [<ffffffff80247366>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
> [ 3816.197140] [<ffffffff8020c150>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> [ 3816.197145] ---[ end trace 1e05d800555b77d7 ]---
It's an error in workqueue-avoid-recursion-in-run_workqueue.patch, methinks.
We used to permit keventd to run flush_workqueue():
static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
{
int active;
if (cwq->thread == current) {
/*
* Probably keventd trying to flush its own queue. So simply run
* it by hand rather than deadlocking.
*/
run_workqueue(cwq);
active = 1;
} else {
struct wq_barrier barr;
active = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
if (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist) || cwq->current_work != NULL) {
insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, &cwq->worklist);
active = 1;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
if (active)
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
}
return active;
}
but after workqueue-avoid-recursion-in-run_workqueue.patch, we warn
instead:
static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
{
int active = 0;
struct wq_barrier barr;
WARN_ON(cwq->thread == current);
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
if (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist) || cwq->current_work != NULL) {
insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, &cwq->worklist);
active = 1;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
if (active)
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
return active;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/