Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver

[Dan Williams]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:23:46 -0700, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  Or, just use some platform_data to identify the channel in the same
>> manner as atmel-mci?
>
> Yes, I still want to control chan->chan_id.
>
> The atmel-mci does not select "channel".  It just pick the first
> usable channel of the dma_device specified by platform_data.  I
> suppose dw_dmac is symmetric (it can use any channel for any slave).

You are right, it does not hardwire the channel, but it does hardwire
the device, see at32_add_device_mci [1].

> But TXx9 SoC DMAC channels are hardwired to each peripheral devices.

I think creating a dma_device instance per channel and specifying that
device like atmel-mci is the more future-proof way to go.

> And I want to call Channel-3 of DMAC-0 "dma0chan3" even if Channel-2
> was assigned to for public memcpy channel.

The problem is you could pass in the chan_id to guarantee 'chan3', but
there is no guarantee that you will get 'dma0', as the driver has no
knowledge of what other dma devices may be in the system.

[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c;h=3fbfd1e32a9ee79af4f4545d95a9543b9070d189;hb=HEAD#l1327
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/