Re: What's coming in the security subsystem

[James Morris]

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:

> James Morris wrote:
> >       IMA: fix ima_delete_rules() definition
> 
> Since the term IMA and the implementation are new and specialist, the
> meaning of this TLA is not widely known.  Hence it would be nice if you
> prefixed IMA changes with "integrity: IMA:" like some of the other
> pending IMA changes.
> 
> > Kentaro Takeda (8):
> >       Add in_execve flag into task_struct.
> >       Memory and pathname management functions.
> >       Common functions for TOMOYO Linux.
> >       File operation restriction part.
> >       Domain transition handler.
> >       LSM adapter functions.
> >       Kconfig and Makefile
> >       MAINTAINERS info
> 
> A "TOMOYO:" prefix would add a nice touch to these titles.

It's too late to change the existing commits, but there definitely should 
have been 'tomoyo:' prefixes in the patch subjects.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/