Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock

[Peter W. Morreale]

On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 06:59 -0600, Peter W. Morreale wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Vernon Mauery <vernux@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> 
> > 
> > But then again I'm not sure it's  worth it if the problem only
> > happens in out of tree RT.
> > 
> 
> Heh.  That darn bastard child again, eh?  :-)
> 
> 
> Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline. 
> 

Err..  correction... *about* to be in mainline.   Only point I'm making
is that RT does implicitly, if not explicitly, contributes to mainline.
Its not a one-way street. 

Best,
-PWM

> Best,
> -PWM
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/