Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix TRACING_SUPPORT dependency
From: Anton Vorontsov
Date: Fri Mar 20 2009 - 15:39:20 EST
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:04:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > commit 40ada30f9621fbd831ac2437b9a2a399aad34b00 ("tracing: clean
> > up menu"), despite the "clean up" in its purpose, introduced
> > behavioural change for Kconfig symbols: we no longer able to
> > select tracing support on PPC32 (because IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT isn't
> > yet implemented).
>
> Could you please solve this by implementing proper irqflag-tracing
> support? It's been available upstream for almost three years. It's
> needed for lockdep support as well, etc.
Breaking things via clean up patches is an interesting method of
encouraging something to implement. ;-)
Surely I'll look into implementing irqflags tracing, but considering
that no one ever needed this for almost three years, and that we
explicitly have the code to deal with tracing-w/o-irqflags, can we
please restore the old behaviour?
At least for 2.6.30, because I don't think I'll have enough time to
implement/test/push irqflags tracing support in time for 2.6.30-rc1.
Thanks,
p.s.
It would make more sense if 40ada30f's commit message would state
that tracing w/o irqflags is now obsolete, or better, if it was
discussed on some mailinglist, so that we'd have some time to
adapt the architecture-specific code.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/