Re: [PATCH 3/7] blktrace: remove blk_probe_mutex
From: Li Zefan
Date: Sun Mar 22 2009 - 02:04:26 EST
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:48:26AM +0800, Li Zefan escreveu:
>> blk_register_tracepoints() always returns 0, so make it return void, thus
>> we don't need to use blk_probe_mutex to protect blk_probes_ref.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Historic reasons, when I first worked on this I found all those WARN_ONs
> in blk_register_tracepoints a bogosity that should be later fixed, but
> to reduce the patch size I never got around to submit the proper patch,
> so I don't think that the fix is what you suggests, here it is what I
> had before I removed the non-essential parts of the patch:
>
I though register_trace_xxx() will fail only when there is a name collision,
in this case WARN_ON() and return 0 should be reasonable. But I just dig into
the code and found it may allocate memory and thus might return ENOMEM, so
I guess it's better to check the return value, though it will hardly happen
in real-life..
> +static void blk_tracer_error(const char *name)
> +{
> + pr_info("blk trace: Couldn't activate tracepoint "
> + "probe to block_%s\n", name);
> +}
> +
> +#define register_trace_block(tpoint) \
> + ret = register_trace_block_##tpoint(blk_add_trace_##tpoint); \
> + if (ret) { \
> + blk_tracer_error(#tpoint); \
> + goto *exit_point; \
> + } else \
> + exit_point = &&fail_deprobe_##tpoint;
> +
> +
> +#define fail_trace_block(tpoint) \
> + fail_deprobe_##tpoint: \
> + unregister_trace_block_##tpoint(blk_add_trace_##tpoint)
> +
> +static int tracing_blk_register(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + void *exit_point = &&error;
> +
> + register_trace_block(rq_abort);
> + register_trace_block(rq_insert);
> + register_trace_block(rq_issue);
> + register_trace_block(rq_requeue);
> + register_trace_block(rq_complete);
> + register_trace_block(bio_bounce);
> + register_trace_block(bio_backmerge);
> + register_trace_block(bio_frontmerge);
> + register_trace_block(bio_queue);
> + register_trace_block(getrq);
> + register_trace_block(sleeprq);
> + register_trace_block(plug);
> + register_trace_block(unplug_timer);
> + register_trace_block(unplug_io);
> + register_trace_block(split);
> + register_trace_block(remap);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> + fail_trace_block(remap);
> + fail_trace_block(split);
> + fail_trace_block(unplug_io);
> + fail_trace_block(unplug_timer);
> + fail_trace_block(plug);
> + fail_trace_block(sleeprq);
> + fail_trace_block(getrq);
> + fail_trace_block(bio_queue);
> + fail_trace_block(bio_frontmerge);
> + fail_trace_block(bio_backmerge);
> + fail_trace_block(bio_bounce);
> + fail_trace_block(rq_complete);
> + fail_trace_block(rq_requeue);
> + fail_trace_block(rq_issue);
> + fail_trace_block(rq_insert);
> + fail_trace_block(rq_abort);
> +error:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void tracing_blk_unregister(void)
> +{
> + unregister_trace_block_remap(blk_add_trace_remap);
> + unregister_trace_block_split(blk_add_trace_split);
> + unregister_trace_block_unplug_io(blk_add_trace_unplug_io);
> + unregister_trace_block_unplug_timer(blk_add_trace_unplug_timer);
> + unregister_trace_block_plug(blk_add_trace_plug);
> + unregister_trace_block_sleeprq(blk_add_trace_sleeprq);
> + unregister_trace_block_getrq(blk_add_trace_getrq);
> + unregister_trace_block_bio_queue(blk_add_trace_bio_queue);
> + unregister_trace_block_bio_frontmerge(blk_add_trace_bio_frontmerge);
> + unregister_trace_block_bio_backmerge(blk_add_trace_bio_backmerge);
> + unregister_trace_block_bio_complete(blk_add_trace_bio_complete);
> + unregister_trace_block_bio_bounce(blk_add_trace_bio_bounce);
> + unregister_trace_block_rq_complete(blk_add_trace_rq_complete);
> + unregister_trace_block_rq_requeue(blk_add_trace_rq_requeue);
> + unregister_trace_block_rq_issue(blk_add_trace_rq_issue);
> + unregister_trace_block_rq_insert(blk_add_trace_rq_insert);
> + unregister_trace_block_rq_abort(blk_add_trace_rq_abort);
> + tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
> +}
>
> Regards,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/