Re: [PATCH 07/57] microblaze_v7: Signal support

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 18 March 2009, monstr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/microblaze/include/asm/signal.h |  165 +++++++++++
>  arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c      |  536 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 701 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/microblaze/include/asm/signal.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c

> From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/microblaze/include/asm/ipc.h       |    1 +
>  arch/microblaze/include/asm/ipcbuf.h    |   36 +++++
>  arch/microblaze/kernel/sys_microblaze.c |  226 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/microblaze/include/asm/ipc.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/microblaze/include/asm/ipcbuf.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/microblaze/kernel/sys_microblaze.c

I don't quite remember what the outcome of this discussion was the last
time, but what is your plan for the deprecated syscalls like the
legacy syscalls you add here?

Have you tried changing uClibc and/or glibc so you don't need them?
Are you planning to remove them soon once they are not needed any
more?

What about the syscalls that are not needed but you just get from
common code (e.g. oldumount, time, old_readdir, ...)?

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/