Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix blkdev_issue_flush() failure handling

[Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao]

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 30 March 2009, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> > Chris Mason wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:22 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > > Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > > > > As long as we keep the call there this is probably good, but after
> > > > > > talking w/ Chris Mason, I think the call is extraneous anyway and should
> > > > > > probably just be removed...
> > > > > Yes, I agree, but it takes a lot of digging to be completely sure of
> > > > > that it's safe to remove it.  Interestingly, it was you who added the
> > > > > patch which added the call to blkdev_issue_flush():
> > > > > commit d755fb384250d6bd7fd18a0930e71965acc8e72e
> > > > > Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Date:   Fri Jul 11 19:27:31 2008 -0400
> > > > Yes, it was.  Although I got the idea when hch pointed out that SuSE did
> > > > this... thanks to Chris.  It's come full circle.  :)
> > > Grin.  I'm not sure the I_DIRTY checks alone are enough to decide that a
> > > commit is required though.  I think the inode could be clean but still
> > > have metadata that needs commit.
> > Chris, I have just sent patches that attempt to fix both ext3 and
> > ext4 while also adding a per-device sysfs knob tu disable
> > write-flushes. A previous version of this patch set added a new
> > generic mount option but comments from Christoph and others
> > convinced me to turn it into a per-device tunable. Could you take
> > a look at the patches?
> >
> > Bartlomiej, I have just noticed that I happened to be working on
> > patches for reiserfs and xfs similar to the ones you sent earlier
> > this week. I picked some bits from your submission so I took the
> > liberty to add your signed-off to my patches. Could you take a
> > look at them and let me know if you are confortable with that?
>
> I'm fine with people building bigger changes on top of my patches
> but if you do so you please clearly denote in the patch description
> what changes you have applied to the original patch...

You are right, sorry about that. I will add a short changelog when I
resubmit the patches.

Thanks!

- Fernando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/