Re: mmotm 2009-04-10-02-21 uploaded - forkbombed by work_for_cpu

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:18:53 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > So I do think Andrew's commit is broken and we should think about 
> > it a bit more, but I also think that Valdis' problem comes from 
> > acpi-cpufreq just being damn stupid. Doing a 
> > smp_call_function_single() to read two MSR's is going to be a 
> > _lot_ more efficient than doing that crazy work_on_cpu() for that.
> > 
> > So the _real_ problem came through the commits like
> > 
> >     cpufreq: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for drv_read and drv_write
> >     cpumask: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for read_measured_perf_ctrs
> > 
> > that were meant to reduce stack usage with big cpu masks. And 
> > sure, the _old_ way of doing it was also stupid (it rescheduled 
> > the process to the other CPU by using cpus_allowed()).
> > 
> > Mike, Ingo?
> 
> I think Andrew has a stack of fixes queued up, one of which should 
> solve this problem too - which Mike tested - as the commit from 
> Andrew has caused another regression as well.
> 
> There's no sha1 - the patch is in this thread on lkml:
> 
>   sysbench(oltp)+mysql 10% regression with 2.6.30-rc1
> 
> | From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> |
> | Atttempting to rid us of the problematic work_on_cpu().  Just use
> | smp_call_fuction_single() here.
> |
> | This repairs a 10% sysbench(oltp)+mysql regression which Mike 
> | reported,
> 

Yup.  It's presently in Len's hands.  And Rusty's.

Vladis, perhaps you can verify?


From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Atttempting to rid us of the problematic work_on_cpu().  Just use
smp_call_fuction_single() here.

This repairs a 10% sysbench(oltp)+mysql regression which Mike reported,
due to 

commit 6b44003e5ca66a3fffeb5bc90f40ada2c4340896
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 9 09:50:37 2009 -0600

    work_on_cpu(): rewrite it to create a kernel thread on demand

It seems that the kernel calls these acpi-cpufreq functions at a quite
high frequency.

Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   25 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~arch-x86-kernel-cpu-cpufreq-acpi-cpufreqc-avoid-using-work_on_cpu arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~arch-x86-kernel-cpu-cpufreq-acpi-cpufreqc-avoid-using-work_on_cpu
+++ a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -153,7 +153,8 @@ struct drv_cmd {
 	u32 val;
 };
 
-static long do_drv_read(void *_cmd)
+/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
+static void do_drv_read(void *_cmd)
 {
 	struct drv_cmd *cmd = _cmd;
 	u32 h;
@@ -170,10 +171,10 @@ static long do_drv_read(void *_cmd)
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
-	return 0;
 }
 
-static long do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
+/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
+static void do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
 {
 	struct drv_cmd *cmd = _cmd;
 	u32 lo, hi;
@@ -192,23 +193,21 @@ static long do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static void drv_read(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
 {
 	cmd->val = 0;
 
-	work_on_cpu(cpumask_any(cmd->mask), do_drv_read, cmd);
+	smp_call_function_single(cpumask_any(cmd->mask), do_drv_read, cmd, 1);
 }
 
 static void drv_write(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
 {
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	for_each_cpu(i, cmd->mask) {
-		work_on_cpu(i, do_drv_write, cmd);
-	}
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cmd->mask)
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, do_drv_write, cmd, 1);
 }
 
 static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
@@ -252,15 +251,13 @@ struct perf_pair {
 	} aperf, mperf;
 };
 
-
-static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
+/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
+static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
 	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
 
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -283,7 +280,7 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
-	if (!work_on_cpu(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin))
+	if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur, 1))
 		return 0;
 
 	cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/