Andrew Morton wrote:Andrew, can we drop this for now and at get the other patches in? At least the first one ("Fix platform return check"), since it's an obvious bug fix.On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:03:37 -0800
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...This reader is unable to determine what the mystery preempt_disable()I cannot recall why it's here. So a comment is really needed.
is here for. It needs a comment, please.
This preempt_disable() may not be needed.
What happens if two CPUs oops at the same time (which is fairly common)?...
OK. I'll look at this.
It would be prudent to have a timeout in this loop. The machine hasRight.
crashed and subsystems and hardware and memory are in an unknown and
possibly bad state.
...
This looks like we're abusing the "unblank" method.OK. Will take a look about this point.
If you think that the console subsystem is missing some capability
which this driver needs then please do prefer to fix the console
subsystem, rather than awkwardly making things fit.
None of this happened.
It makes me reluctant to merge that patches as they stand, because then
it all gets forgotten about, whereas holding the patches back will
remind us that updates are needed.
Sorry for late reply.
I couldn't have time for this patch.
I'll look at this again and will resend updates.
Thanks,
Hiroshi