Re: linux-next ia64 build problems in slqb

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The ia64 "allnoconfig" build ends up with the (possibly dubious) combination
>> > of .config options:
>> >
>> >        CONFIG_SMP=n
>> >        CONFIG_NUMA=y
>>
>> Yeah, I don't think the combination makes much sense and x86 doesn't
>> allow it. Can we fix that in ia64 Kconfig? That said, this seems to
>> come up with every architecture except x86, so if someone is kind
>> enough to send me a tested fix for slqb, I'll just go ahead and apply
>> it.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tony runs tests with this configuration. This is an established
> configuration and has been historically supported.

Interesting. What exactly is an UP NUMA machine? Anyway, I'm more than
happy to apply a tested patch to fix up SLQB. Nick?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/