Re: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional

[Andre Noll]

On 11:39, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yes, I believe it would be easier than having dynamically allocated 
> arrays.  Dynamically generated arrays using static memory allocations 
> (bss) is one thing, but that would only reduce size of the module on 
> disk, which I don't think anyone considers a problem.

We would save 64K of RAM in the raid5-only case if we'd defer the
allocation of the multiplication table until the first raid6 array
is about to be started.


Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature