[PATCH] SELinux: Remove excessive interrupt disablement

From: David Howells
Date: Wed Apr 29 2009 - 08:48:30 EST


There's no need to disable interrupts with spin_lock_irqsave() inside of
read_lock_irq().

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

security/selinux/hooks.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index ba808ef..0702ba6 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -2378,7 +2378,6 @@ static void selinux_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
struct sighand_struct *psig;
u32 osid, sid;
int rc, i;
- unsigned long flags;

osid = tsec->osid;
sid = tsec->sid;
@@ -2410,9 +2409,9 @@ static void selinux_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
* wait permission to the new task SID. */
read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
psig = current->parent->sighand;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&psig->siglock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&psig->siglock);
wake_up_interruptible(&current->parent->signal->wait_chldexit);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&psig->siglock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&psig->siglock);
read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/