Re: [PATCH 0/3] add tracepoints docbook (take #2)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:29:08PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>
> > The following patches add a new tracepoint docbook. Since 
> > tracepoints can be defined by various macros and in various 
> > files, I think it important to clearly document the available 
> > tracepoints, as Andrew has pointed out. This helps us see what 
> > we have and what we don't have. If this patch is accepted, I 
> > hope that others will add docbook style comments, so we can have 
> > a complete accounting of the kernel's tracepoints.
> > 
> 
> hi,
> 
> i'd also like to get some agreement that future tracepoints need 
> to have this sort of documentation included when they are 
> submitted. Also, I'd like people who have already submitted 
> tracepoints to go back and add this kind of documentation. I'll 
> volunteer to police the effort if we agree it should be done.

sure - but sending patches would be even more useful than policing
:)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/