Re: [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting inredirty_page_for_writepage()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > Plus percpu_add_preemptsafe().
> >
> > Ok - that would be easy. Would you be interested in doing that 
> > and would you be interested in resurrecting your old patches? 
> > They are genuinely useful IMHO.
> 
> I see but it may take some time for me to get that finished 
> (probably 2 weeks or so). Dont feel that you have to merge my old 
> patches or a variant thereof.

it's your baby really and i dont want to interfere in any negative 
way. The patches look fairly complete and you did all the hard work 
with them already.

Can help out with review and testing (as always) but i suspect it's 
more appropriate for -mm to carry them in the end, because of the MM 
and tree-wide impact, and because the fine differences between those 
APIs will only be truly visible on non-x86.

( There's also Tejun's latest improvements of the dynamic allocator
  that he made based on your feedback - are those in any tree yet? )

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/