Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix stale swap cache leak v5
From: Daisuke Nishimura
Date: Fri May 01 2009 - 22:57:54 EST
> > > Daisuke in the race conditions mentioned is (2) significant? Since the
> > > accounting is already fixed during mem_cgroup_uncharge_page()?
> > >
> > Do you mean type-2 stale swap caches I described before ?
> >
> > They doesn't pressure mem.usage nor memsw.usage as you say,
> > but consumes swp_entry(of cource, type-1 has this problem too).
> > As a result, all the swap space can be used up and causes OOM.
> >
>
> Good point..
>
> > I've verified it long ago by:
> >
> > - make swap space small(50MB).
> > - set mem.limit(32MB).
> > - run some programs(allocate, touch sometimes, exit) enough to
> > exceed mem.limit repeatedly(I used page01 included in ltp and run
> > 5 instances 8MB per each in cpuset with 4cpus.).
> > - wait for a very long time :) (2,30 hours IIRC)
> > You can see the usage of swap cache(grep SwapCached /proc/meminfo)
> > increasing gradually.
> >
> >
> > BTW, I'm now testing a attached patch to fix type-2 with setting page-cluster
> > to 0 to aboid type-1, and seeing what happens in the usage of swap cache.
> > (I can't test it in large box though, because my office is closed till May 06.)
> >
In my small box(i386/2CPU/2GB mem), a similar test shows after 12H
about 600MB leak of swap cache before applying this patch,
while no outstanding leak can be seen after it.
(snip)
> Looking through the patch, I have my doubts
>
> shrink_page_list() will catch the page - how? It is not on memcg's
> LRU, so if we have a small cgroup with lots of memory, when the cgroup
> is running out of memory, will this page show up in
> shrink_page_list()?
>
It's just because the page has not been uncharged yet when shrink_page_list()
is called(,more precicely, when shrink_inactive_list() isolates the page),
so it can be handled in memcg's LRU scanning.
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/