[tip:x86/urgent] x86: show number of core_siblings instead of thread_siblings in /proc/cpuinfo

[tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann]

Commit-ID:  35d11680a9d82c93eb92f08f9702b72877427b4a
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/35d11680a9d82c93eb92f08f9702b72877427b4a
Author:     Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:28:59 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:36:49 +0200

x86: show number of core_siblings instead of thread_siblings in /proc/cpuinfo

Commit 7ad728f98162cb1af06a85b2a5fc422dddd4fb78
(cpumask: x86: convert cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t)
changed the output of /proc/cpuinfo for siblings:

Example on an AMD Phenom:

  physical id   : 0
  siblings : 1
  core id	   : 3
  cpu cores  : 4

Before that commit it was:

  physical id	: 0
  siblings : 4
  core id	   : 3
  cpu cores  : 4

Instead of cpu_core_mask it now uses cpu_sibling_mask to count siblings.
This is due to the following hunk of above commit:

|  --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
|  +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
|  @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinf
|          if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
|                  seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
|                  seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
|  -                          cpus_weight(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu)));
|  +                          cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
|                  seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
|                  seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
|                  seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);

This was a mistake, because the impact line shows that this side-effect
was not anticipated:

   Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y

So revert the respective hunk to restore the old behavior.

[ Impact: fix sibling-info regression in /proc/cpuinfo ]

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <20090504182859.GA29045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>


---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index f93047f..d5e3039 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c,
 	if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
 		seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
 		seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
-			   cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
+			   cpumask_weight(cpu_core_mask(cpu)));
 		seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
 		seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
 		seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/