Re: Wrong network usage reported by /proc

From: Robert Hancock
Date: Tue May 05 2009 - 00:46:21 EST


Matthias Saou wrote:
Hi,

I'm posting here as a last resort. I've got lots of heavily used RHEL5
servers (2.6.18 based) that are reporting all sorts of impossible
network usage values through /proc, leading to unrealistic snmp/cacti
graphs where the outgoing bandwidth used it higher than the physical
interface's maximum speed.

For some details and a test script which compares values from /proc
with values from tcpdump :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489541

The values collected using tcpdump always seem realistic and match the
values seen on the remote network equipments. So my obvious conclusion
(but possibly wrong given my limited knowledge) is that something is
wrong in the kernel, since it's the one exposing the /proc interface.

I've reproduced what seems to be the same problem on recent kernels,
including the 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 I'm running right now. The
simple python script available here allows to see it quite easily :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2009-February/msg00166.html

* I run the script on my Workstation, I have an FTP server enabled
* I download a DVD ISO from a remote workstation : The values match
* I start ping floods from remote workstations : The values reported
by /proc are much higher than the ones reported by tcpdump. I used
"ping -s 500 -f myworkstation" from two remote workstations

If there's anything flawed in my debugging, I'd love to have someone
point it out to me. TIA to anyone willing to have a look.

Matthias


There may well be a bug in the kernel you're using, but you'd likely have more luck reporting a bug to Red Hat - the RHEL5 kernel is quite old and heavily patched and not many LKML people will likely be familiar with what RH may have done to it..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/